Mezhepler Tarihi: Muhammed Ebu Zehra. 1 like. Book. Mezhepler Tarihi. Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Mezhepler Tarihi – Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Category: Religious. Description. MUHAMMED EBU ZEHRA, ÝSLÂMDA SIYASÎ VE ÝTIKADÎ MEZHEPLER TARIHI (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL AND THEOLOGICAL SCHOOLS IN ISLAM)
|Published (Last):||2 May 2018|
|PDF File Size:||5.15 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.64 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Each one grabs an organ of the elephant and tries to imagine what it is.
Iğdır University Lifelong Learning Programme
As their understanding and capacities differ, their views and beliefs differ likewise. The example of Plato clarifies this issue very well: So, even if they are wrong, he insists on his views. The difference in the capacity of understanding and insight: The fact that the issues that are open to disagreement are actually unclear: Some blind reach the place of an elephant.
There are lots of people whose capacity of understanding is high, evaluation precise, and reflection keen.
This kind of a desire leads someone to the conviction that what he says is the ultimate truth and the opposite views are absolutely wrong. The one who reaches zehga its back says that this is a creature like high hills.
People cannot be far from the truth, as well as they cannot express it to the full. For this reason, the matter will be better understood if zebra the verses about the issue are looked into.
Skip to main content. In order to make a comment, please login or register. For this reason, Socrates mezhhepler, If the thing upon which disagreement exits is known, every disagreement stops.
Abu Zahra says that in the letters of the institution Ihvanussafa these are related about this issue: One of the reasons of the disagreement is the imitation of the old; because imitation causes blind and faulty conviction.
Otherwise, it may be thought that everyone says the truth at the first glance; but in reality the conclusion they reach is defective and lacking. Wherever is human there is disagreement, because this is part of the characteristics of human. What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues?
In addition, there are the ones who are stupid, whose hearts are blind and confused.
As is seen, each of them understood just one part of the truth, declared their friends wrong, and claimed that they are mistaken in the understanding of the truth.
If I may put it this way, as it is better to look at the elephant and depict it as a whole; it is also better to look at the verses of the Koran as a whole. Log in Create new account Random Question. So, Man wills and Tzrihi creates. If looked into as a whole, not separately, the truth will be better understood. For example, there are differences in the way the scholars of fiqh Islamic Jurisprudence and theology view the Quran. The one who grabs one of its legs says that this is a long and zenra animal similar to a trunk of a tree.
Even twins of a family raised in the same culture, under the same material and spiritual circumstances, and instructed by the same teachers may disagree in some issues.
In the things man wills he cannot escape responsibility. There are very different groups of jobs. This is one of the reasons why the learned differed in their views and sects. Every person penetrates into an aspect of the truth. Besides the factor of creation, the other factors having effect in this matter are shortly as follow: The one who grabs its ear says that it is a flat and thin creature that can be folded up. For example, while it is mentioned in the Koran about the free will of the human, it is also stated that all kinds of will and power are peculiar to God.
Therefore; while there are verses supporting the Mutazile who says that people create their own deeds and that God has no intervention in the deeds of His slaves; there are also verses supporting the Cebriyye who mezhepker that people have no will and that they are like leaves tarih the wind against the will of God.
Disagreements arise because everyone has different desires, interests, and dispositions.